Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBotelho, Leonardo Monteiropt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Quezada, Leonpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRozisky, Joanna Ripollpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBrietzke, Aline Patríciapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Iraci Lucena da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDeitos, Alíciapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFregni, Felipept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCaumo, Wolneipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-30T02:14:53Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/148672pt_BR
dc.description.abstractMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain. However, its neurobiological mechanisms are not entirely elucidated. Given the complex interaction between the networks involved in pain process, our approach, to providing insights into the neural mechanisms of pain, was to investigate the relationship between neurophysiological, neurochemical and clinical outcomes such as corticospinal excitability. Recent evidence has demonstrated that three neural systems are affected in chronic pain: (i) motor corticospinal system; (ii)internal descending pain modulation system; and (iii) the system regulating neuroplasticity. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to examine the relationship between these three central systems in patients with chronic MPS of whom do/do not respond to the Conditioned Pain Modulation Task (CPM-task). The CPM-task was to immerse her non-dominant hand in cold water (0−1◦C) to produce a heterotopic nociceptive stimulus. Corticospinal excitability was the primary outcome; specifically, the motor evoked potential (MEP) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Secondary outcomes were the cortical excitability parameters [current silen tperiod (CSP) and short intracortical inhibition (SICI)], serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), heat pain threshold (HPT), and the disability related to pain (DRP). We included 33 women, (18–65years old). The MANCOVA model using Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test revealed that non-responders (n=10) compared to responders (n=23) presented increased intracortical facilitation (ICF;mean±SD) 1.43(0.3) vs.1.11(0.12), greater motor-evoked potential amplitude (μV) 1.93(0.54) vs.1.40(0.27), as well a higher serum BDNF (pg/Ml) 32.56 (9.95) vs.25.59(10.24), (P<0.05 forall). Also, non-responders presented higher level of DRP and decreased HPT (P<0.05forall). These findings suggest that the loss of net descending pain inhibition was associated with an increase in ICF, serum BDNF levels, and DRP. We propose a framework to explain the relationship and potential directionality of these factors. In this framework we hypothesize that increased central sensitization leads to a loss of descending pain inhibition that triggers compensatory mechanismsas shown by increased motor cortical excitability.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in human neuroscience. Lousanne. Vol. 10 (June 2016), article 308, 12 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectBNDFen
dc.subjectSíndromes da dor miofascialpt_BR
dc.subjectPlasticidade neuronalpt_BR
dc.subjectCortical excitabilityen
dc.subjectNeurofisiologiapt_BR
dc.subjectCPMen
dc.subjectMEPen
dc.subjectNeuroquímicapt_BR
dc.subjectTMSen
dc.subjectFator neurotrófico derivado do encéfalopt_BR
dc.subjectQSTen
dc.subjectChronic painen
dc.titleA framework for understanding the relationship between descending pain modulation, motor corticospinal and neuroplasticity regulation systems in chronic myofascial painpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000997146pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples