Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorParis, Fernanda dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorVoigt, Francinept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiropt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Kátia Ruschel Pilger dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorWillers, Denise Maria Cunhapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMayora, Dirce Velosopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPaiva, Rodrigo Minutopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBarth, Afonso Luispt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T02:26:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2357-9730pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/158418pt_BR
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum. Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients. Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and biomedical research. Porto Alegre. Vol. 36 , n. 1 , (2016), p. 18-22pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectTuberculosept_BR
dc.subjectMycobacterium sp.en
dc.subjectPulmonary tuberculosisen
dc.subjectSaúde públicapt_BR
dc.subjectDiagnósticopt_BR
dc.subjectNucleic acid amplification testsen
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reactionen
dc.titleEnhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reactio : an experience at a tertiary hospitalpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001012063pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples