Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBrites, Carlospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPinto Neto, Lauro Ferreira da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Melissa Soarespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Estevão Portelapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSprinz, Eduardopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Mariana Carvalho e Silva dept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T02:41:31Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1413-8670pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/183907pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Development of drug-resistance mutations is the main cause of failure in antiretroviral therapy. In Brazil, there is scarce information on resistance pattern for patients failing antiretroviral therapy. Objectives: To define the HIV mutational profile associated with drug resistance in Brazilian patients from 5 large cities, after first, second or further failures to antiretroviral therapy. Methods: We reviewed genotyping results of 1520 patients failing therapy in five Brazilian cities. Frequency of mutations, mean number of active drugs, viral susceptibility to each antiretrovirals drug, and regional differences were assessed. Results: Mean time of antiretrovirals use was 22.7 ± 41.1 months. Mean pre-genotyping viral load was 4.2 ± 0.8 log (2.1 ± 2.0 after switching antiretrovirals). Mean number of remaining active drugs was 9.4, 9.0, and 7.9 after 1st, 2nd, and 3rd failure, respectively. We detected regional variations in drug susceptibility: while BA and RS showed the highest (∼40%) resistance level to ATV/r, FPV/r and LPV/r, in the remaining cities it was around half of this rate. We detected 90% efavirenz/nevirapine resistance in SP, only 45% in RS, and levels between 25% and 30% in the other cities. Regarding NRTI, we found a similar pattern, with RJ presenting the highest, and CE the lowest susceptibility rates for all NRTI. Zidovudine resistance was detected in only 3% of patients in RJ, against 45–65% in the other cities. RJ and RS showed 3% resistance to tenofovir, while in CE it reached 55%. DRV/r (89–97%) and etravirine (61–85%) were the most active drugs, but again, with a wide variation across cities. Conclusions: The resistance mutational profile of Brazilian patients failing antiretroviral therapy is quite variable, depending on the city where patients were tested. This variation likely reflects distinctive choice of antiretrovirals drugs to initiate therapy, adherence to specific drugs, or circulating HIV-1 strains. Overall, etravirine and DRV/r remain as the most active drugs.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases. Vol. 20, no. 4 (Jul./Aug. 2016), p. 323-329pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectResistência a medicamentospt_BR
dc.subjectHIVen
dc.subjectResistanceen
dc.subjectInfecções por HIVpt_BR
dc.subjectCarga viralpt_BR
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectMutationsen
dc.subjectGenótipopt_BR
dc.subjectMutaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectAdultopt_BR
dc.titleExtensive variation in drug-resistance mutational profile of Brazilian patients failing antiretroviral therapy in five large Brazilian citiespt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001055049pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples