Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorGrando, Rafael Domingospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBrentano, Vicente B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZanardo, Ana Paulapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHertz, Felipe Teixeirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAnflor Júnior, Luis Carlospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Jônatas Fávaro Prietto dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGalvão, Gabriela Schneiderpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorZavascki, Alexandre Prehnpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGazzana, Marcelo Bassopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-01T04:25:26Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1413-8670pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/229321pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: COVID-19 is a new disease and the most common complication is pneumonia.The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) proposed an expert consensus for imagingclassification for COVID-19 pneumonia.Objective: To evaluate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility of chest CT stan-dards in the beginning of the Brazilian COVID-19 outbreak.Methods: Cross-sectional study performed from March 1st to April 14th, 2020. Patients withsuspected COVID-19 pneumonia submitted to RT-PCR test and chest computed tomography(CT) were included. Tw o thoracic radiologists blinded for RT-PCR and clinical and laboratoryresults classified every patient scan according to the RSNA expert consensus. A third thoracicradiologist also evaluated in case of discordance, and consensus was reached among thethree radiologists. A typical appearance was considered a positive chest CT for COVID-19pneumonia. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to evaluate intra- and inter-rater agreements.Results: A total of 159 patients were included (mean age 57.9 ± 18.0 years; 88 [55.3%] males):86 (54.1%) COVID-19 and 73 (45.9%) non-COVID-19 patients. Eighty (50.3%) patients had apositive CT for COVID-19 pneumonia. Sensitivity and specificity of typical appearance were88.3% (95%CI, 79.9–93.5) and 94.5% (95%CI, 86.7–97.8), respectively. Intra- and inter-rateragreement were assessed (Cohen’s kappa = 0.924, P = 0.06; Cohen’s kappa=0.772, P = 0.05,respectively).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases. Vol. 24, no. 6 (2020), p. 524-533.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectCOVID-19pt_BR
dc.subjectCoronavirus disease 2019en
dc.subjectViral pneumoniaen
dc.subjectPneumonia viralpt_BR
dc.subjectDiagnósticopt_BR
dc.subjectCTen
dc.subjectDiagnosisen
dc.subjectTomografia computadorizada por raios Xpt_BR
dc.titleClinical usefulness of tomographic standards for covid-19 pneumonia diagnosis : experience from a Brazilian reference centerpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001130293pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples