Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorVaz, Fabiano Nunespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDewes, Homeropt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPadula, Antonio Domingospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTalamini, Edsonpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-23T03:35:14Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2013pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1824-2049pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/267524pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThis study assesses the correlation between reports on food risk published in scientific journals and in the printed mass media and changes in the meat market. It focuses on the case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the United Kingdom. The findings suggest that during the time BSE and its related human disease were of noticeable public concern, there was a predominantly negative correlation between the number of reports on BSE published in the British printed mass media and meat market variables. In contrast, reports of scientific research on the disease contributed to reducing the perception of food risk because these numbers correlated positively with the meat market.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJCOM: Journal of Science Communication. Trieste, Italy. Vol. 12, no. 2 (June 2013), p. 1-22pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectCarne bovinapt_BR
dc.subjectMercadopt_BR
dc.titleMeat market reaction towards mass media and science communication on bovine spongiform encephalopathypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000891368pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples