Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBichet, Daniel G.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHopkin, Robert J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAguiar, Patríciopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAllam , Sridhar R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorChien, Yin-Hsiupt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGiugliani, Robertopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKallish, Stacipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKineen, Sabinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLidove, Olivierpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNiu, Daumingpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOlivotto, Iacopopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPolitei, Juan Manuelpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRakoski, Paulpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTorra, Roserpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTondel, Camillapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Derralynn A.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T05:05:30Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2023pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2296-858Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/273836pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: Fabry disease is a progressive disorder caused by deficiency of the α-galactosidase A enzyme (α-Gal A), leading to multisystemic organ damage with heterogenous clinical presentation. The addition of the oral chaperone therapy migalastat to the available treatment options for Fabry disease is not yet universally reflected in all treatment guidelines. These consensus recommendations are intended to provide guidance for the treatment and monitoring of patients with Fabry disease receiving migalastat. Methods: A modified Delphi process was conducted to determine consensus on treatment decisions and monitoring of patients with Fabry disease receiving migalastat. The multidisciplinary panel comprised 14 expert physicians across nine specialties and two patients with Fabry disease. Two rounds of Delphi surveys were completed and recommendations on the use of biomarkers, multidisciplinary monitoring, and treatment decisions were generated based on statements that reached consensus. Results: The expert panel reached consensus agreement on 49 of 54 statements, including 16 that reached consensus in round 1. Statements that reached consensus agreement are summarized in recommendations for migalastat treatment and monitoring, including baseline and follow-up assessments and frequency. All patients with Fabry disease and an amenable mutation may initiate migalastat treatment if they have evidence of Fabry-related symptoms and/or organ involvement. Treatment decisions should include holistic assessment of the patient, considering clinical symptoms and organ involvement as well as patient-reported outcomes and patient preference. The reliability of α-Gal A and globotriaosylsphingosine as pharmacodynamic response biomarkers remains unclear. Conclusion: These recommendations build on previously published guidelines to highlight the importance of holistic, multidisciplinary monitoring for patients with Fabry disease receiving migalastat, in addition to shared decision-making regarding treatments and monitoring throughout the patient journey.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in medicine. Lausanne, Switzerland. Vol. 10 (Sept. 2023), 1220637, 19 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectChaperone therapyen
dc.subjectAlfa-galactosidasept_BR
dc.subjectAlpha-galactosidase Aen
dc.subjectChaperonas molecularespt_BR
dc.subjectGlobotriaosylsphingosineen
dc.subjectDoença de Fabrypt_BR
dc.subjectAmenabilityen
dc.subjectTreatment decisionsen
dc.subjectPatient journeyen
dc.titleConsensus recommendations for the treatment and management of patients with Fabry disease on migalastat : a modified Delphi studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001198121pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples