Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Thais de Barrospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Sheila Feitosapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLeitzke, Luisa Rodrigues Furtadopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre Júnior, Ronaldo Gomespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSouza Júnior, Alcidésio Sales dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Alice Ramos Oliveira dapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHeineck, Isabelapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFonteles, Marta Maria de Francapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBracken, Louise E.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPeak, Matthewpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLyra Júnior, Divaldo Pereira dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorLima, Elisangela da Costapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T06:56:23Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2431pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/280140pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe use of antimicrobials (AMs) in pediatric infections is common practice and use may be inappropriate leading to antimicrobial resistance. Off-label AM use is also common in this group and can result in drug-related problems. There is lack of DUR data in Brazil and in Latin America, specially for AM pediatric use. The aim of this study was to describe the utilization of AMs in hospitalized children in five hospitals in Brazil. We conducted an observational study of the utilization of AMs in pediatric wards in hospitals in the states of Ceará (CE), Sergipe (SE), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Rio Grande do Sul (RS) and the Federal District (DF). Data derived from patient medical records and prescriptions were collected over a six-month period in each hospital. The number of AMs used by each patient was recorded, and AM use was assessed using Days of therapy (DOT) and Length of therapy (LOT) per 1000 patient days according to different patient characteristics. Off-label (OL) use was described according to age. The study analyzed data from 1020 patients. The sex and age distributions were similar across the five hospitals. However, differences were found for comorbidities, history of ICU admission and length of hospital stay. The most common diseases were respiratory tract infections. There were wide variations in DOT/1000PD (278–517) and LOT/1000PD (265–390). AM utilization was highest in the hospital in SE. The consumption of second-generation penicillins and cephalosporins was high. The prevalence of OL use of AMs was higher for patients in the RJ hospital, in infants, in patients who underwent prolonged hospital stays, and in patients who used multiple AMs. The AM that showed the highest prevalence of OL use was azithromycin, in both oral and parenteral formulations. Overall AM use was high and showed differences in each setting, possibly influenced by local characteristics and by prescribing standards adopted by pediatricians.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMC pediatrics. London. Vol. 24 (2024), 177, 9 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectAnti-infecciosospt_BR
dc.subjectAntimicrobial agentsen
dc.subjectUso de medicamentospt_BR
dc.subjectDrug utilizationen
dc.subjectOff-label useen
dc.subjectUso off-labelpt_BR
dc.subjectCriançapt_BR
dc.subjectPediatricen
dc.subjectHospitalen
dc.titleUse of antimicrobials in pediatric wards of five brazilian hospitalspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001201567pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples