Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorBracco, Paula Andreghettopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorReichelt, Angela de Azevedo Jacobpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Luísia Feichaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVidor, Pedro Rodriguespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorOppermann, Maria Lúcia Rochapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Bruce Bartholowpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Maria Inêspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-27T06:42:30Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2025pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1758-5996pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/289146pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground Women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes, and lifestyle intervention (LSI) offered a decade after pregnancy is effective in preventing diabetes. However, since diabetes frequently onsets in the initial years following pregnancy, preventive actions should be implemented closer to pregnancy. We aimed to assess the effect of lifestyle interventions, compared to standard care, in reducing the incidence of diabetes following a pregnancy complicated by GDM. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception to July 21, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing LSI to prevent diabetes following gestational diabetes. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We evaluated the risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool RoB-2 and the certainty of the evidence with GRADE methodology. We used the DerSimonian-Laird random effects pooling method and evaluated heterogeneity with the I 2 statistic and the Chi2 test. Results We identified 24 studies involving 9017 women. In studies without high risk of bias (18 studies; 8,357 women), LSI reduced the incidence of diabetes by 19% (RR=0.81; 95%CI 0.71.0.93). The effect was significant and more protective (RR=0.78; 0.65, 0.94) in studies evaluating women with GDM identified specifically as at a higher risk of diabetes, compared to those intervening on women with GDM irrespective of risk (RR=0.85; 0.70, 1.04). Similarly, when expressed in absolute terms, the overall number needed to treat (NNT) was 56 considering all studies, 71 for women with GDM irrespective of risk, and 31 for women with GDM at high risk. The intervention produced a lower weight gain (mean difference=-0.88 kg;-1.52, -0.23 for all studies; -0.62 kg;-1.22, -0.02 for studies without high risk of bias). The effects were robust in sensitivity analyses and supported by evidence of moderate certainty for diabetes and weight change. Conclusions LSI offered to women with GDM following pregnancy is effective in preventing type 2 diabetes, despite the small postpartum weight change. The impact of LSI on incidence reduction was greater for women with GDM at a higher diabetes risk.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetology & metabolic syndrome. [São Paulo]. Vol. 17 (2025), 66, 14 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus tipo 2pt_BR
dc.subjectGestational diabetesen
dc.subjectDiabetes gestacionalpt_BR
dc.subjectLifestyleen
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticapt_BR
dc.subjectMetanálisept_BR
dc.titleLifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus : a systematic review and meta-analysis updatept_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001244102pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples