Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCarrilho, Thaís Rangel Bousquetpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMengue, Sotero Serratept_BR
dc.contributor.authorDrehmer, Michelept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T04:26:45Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2020pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2393pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/220837pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured in the first trimester are both used to estimate pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) but there is limited information on how they compare, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where access to a weight scale can be limited. Thus, the main goal of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and weight measured during the first trimester of pregnancy among Brazilian women so as to assess whether self-reported pre-pregnancy weight is reliable and can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG. Methods: Data from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium (BMCNC, n = 5563) and the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance System (SISVAN, n = 393,095) were used to evaluate the agreement between selfreported pre-pregnancy weight and weights measured in three overlapping intervals (30–94, 30–60 and 30–45 days of pregnancy) and their impact in BMI classification. We calculated intraclass correlation and Lin’s concordance coefficients, constructed Bland and Altman plots, and determined Kappa coefficient for the categories of BMI. Results: The mean of the differences between self-reported and measured weights was < 2 kg during the three intervals examined for BMCNC (1.42, 1.39 and 1.56 kg) and about 1 kg for SISVAN (1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 kg). Intraclass correlation and Lin’s coefficient were > 0.90 for both datasets in all time intervals. Bland and Altman plots showed that the majority of the difference laid in the ±2 kg interval and that the differences did not vary according to measured first-trimester BMI. Kappa coefficient values were > 0.80 for both datasets at all intervals. Using self-reported prepregnancy or measured weight would change, in total, the classification of BMI in 15.9, 13.5, and 12.2% of women in the BMCNC and 12.1, 10.7, and 10.2% in the SISVAN, at 30–94, 30–60 and 30–45 days, respectively. Conclusion: In Brazil, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight can be used for calculation of BMI and GWG when an early measurement of weight during pregnancy is not available. These results are especially important in a country where the majority of woman do not initiate prenatal care early in pregnancy.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. London. Vol. 20 (2020), 734, 13 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectWeighten
dc.subjectPeso corporalpt_BR
dc.subjectSelf-reporten
dc.subjectGravidezpt_BR
dc.subjectFirst trimesteren
dc.subjectGanho de peso na gestaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectÍndice de massa corporalpt_BR
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectGestational weight gainen
dc.subjectBody mass indexen
dc.subjectAgreementen
dc.titleAgreement between self-reported prepregnancy weight and measured firsttrimester weight in Brazilian womenpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001123040pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples